Asplenium monodon Liebm.

Primary tabs

Asplenium monodon Liebm.

Descripción

Similar to A. auritum except: blades 1-pinnate, each pinna with a superior auricle often cut almost to costa but with acroscopic auricle adnate at the base, margins deeply biserrate, cut to ca. 1⁄3 distance to midvein; sori (3–)6–8 pairs per pinna, on both sides of midveins; indusia 3–5 X 0.5–0.8 mm; spores globose, large, dark brown to blackish, 32 per sporangium.A

Forma de vida

Epífita or on moist rocks, rarely terrestrialA

Forma de crecimiento

Hierba

Nutrición

Autotrófica

Ejemplar revisado

Chis (Breedlove 22149, DS, 35387, DS, MO). Oax (Mexia 9162, CAS, GH, MO, NY, UC; Mickel 5840, NY, UC). Pue (Vera Santos 2579, UC). Ver (Bourgeau 1829, US; Copeland herb. 63, US; Orcutt 2827, DS, US; Purpus 2415, UC, 2847, MO, UC, US).
Unverified, Doubtful, or Mistaken Reports. Tab (reported by Magaña, 1992, but not verified).
A

Distribución

Caribe presentB, Costa Rica presentB, Guatemala presentB, Honduras presentB, México (Country) native and not endemicB, North America presentB, Panama presentB, South America presentB

Elevación

1001600(–2300) mA

Tipo de vegetación

No especificado

Categoría IUCN

No incluidaC

Categoría NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010

No incluidaD

Estatus del taxón

(A) Como definida actualmente, probablemente una entidad natural (monofilética)

Discusión taxonómica

Asplenium macilentum Klotzsch ex Kunze (1857) was regarded as a distinct species, also occurring in Mexico, by Adams (in Davidse et al., 1995). He excluded A. monodon from Flora Mesoamericana (which we would not) and characterized A. macilentum as having reniform spores, 64 per sporangium. The lectotype of this is of unknown provenance (selected by Morton & Lellinger, 1966: 18, B-Willd. 19890, microfiche UC!), is similar in form, and may also belong in synonymy under this species (Smith, 1981: 48); however, until spores of the lectotype can be examined, it would be imprudent to place the name. Some specimens from northern South America (especially Venezuela) with the morphology of A. macilentum have large, globose spores, like those of A. monodon, while others have small, reniform spores, like those of A. auritum sensu stricto. A plant identified as A. macilentum from Trinidad was reported as 2n=288, apogamous, by Walker (1985), but Adams (in Davidse et al., 1995) stated that all material in the A. auritum complex from Trinidad was referable to A. monodon. Nearly all plants identified by Adams as A. macilentum from Central America we regard as A. auritum, including those he cited (1995: 309) from Chiapas, Belize, Honduras, and Panama.A

Bibliografía

A. Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. 2004: The Pteridophytes of Mexico Vol. 88
B. Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. 2004: The Pteridophytes of Mexico Vol. 88
C. IUCN 2022: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2022-2
D. SEMARNAT 2019: MODIFICACIÓN del Anexo Normativo III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010: 101 pp. – https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5578808&fecha=14/11/2019#gsc.tab=0 [accessed 2023-05-04 06:16]