Elaphoglossum pallidum (Baker) C.Chr.

Primary tabs

Elaphoglossum pallidum (Baker) C.Chr.

Descripción

Rhizomes short-creeping, 5–8 mm diam.; rhizome scales linear, dark reddish brown, lustrous, 6–12 mm long, each with a flexuous tip; phyllopodia absent; fronds clumped, 24–55 X 4.1–5.6 cm; stipes 1⁄3–1⁄2 the frond length, with scales subulate, spreading, sparse or absent, and with a few minute, erect, glandular hairs; blades elliptic, chartaceous, apices caudate, bases usually rounded (less commonly broadly cuneate); veins evident, free, once- or twice-forked, 1.5–2 mm apart, at 70–80° angle to costa; hydathodes absent; blade scales black, subulate, mostly along the margin, generally early-deciduous, mature specimens with only a few scales or scales totally absent, blades also with minute, black, stellate hairs; fertile fronds much shorter than the sterile (1⁄2–2⁄3), intersporangial scales absent.A

Forma de crecimiento

Hierba

Forma de vida

Terrestre, o Epipétrica. EpífitaA

Nutrición

Autotrófica

Ejemplar revisado

Chis (Breedlove 22804, DS, NY, 32046, NY). Gro (Velásquez 257, FCME). Mich (Arsène s.n., 13 Dec 1910, MICH). Mor (Lyonnet 1359, MEXU, 2863, UC, US). Oax (Lorence 4214, NY; Mickel 3772, 7040, NY; Somers 371, NY).A

Distribución

Caribe PresenteA, Centroamérica: Costa Rica PresenteA; Guatemala PresenteA; Panamá PresenteA, México (país) Nativo y no endémicoA, Sudamérica PresenteA

Elevación

1850 – 3000 mA

Tipo de vegetación

Bosque de pino-encino, Bosque de neblina/mesófiloA

Categoría IUCN

No incluidaB

Categoría NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010

No incluidaC

Estatus del taxón

(A) Como definida actualmente, probablemente una entidad natural (monofilética)

Discusión taxonómica

Elaphoglossum pallidum is very close to E. erinaceum but can be distinguished by the former having nearly glabrous blade margins and narrow, dark brown rhizome scales with flexuous tips, and lanceolate (vs. elliptic) blades. It was treated previously (Mickel & Beitel, 1988) as a synonym of E. tambillense (Hook.) T. Moore, which occurs from Costa Rica to Ecuador. Antillean material seems to lack marginal subulate scales entirely, whereas Mexican material is variable, either lacking scales or with a few scales.A

Bibliografía

A. Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. 2004: The Pteridophytes of Mexico Vol. 88
B. IUCN 2022: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2022-2
C. SEMARNAT 2019: MODIFICACIÓN del Anexo Normativo III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010: 101 pp. – https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5578808&fecha=14/11/2019#gsc.tab=0 [accessed 2023-05-04 06:16]