Terpsichore asplenifolia (L.) A.R.Sm.

Primary tabs

Terpsichore asplenifolia (L.) A.R.Sm.

Descripción

Rhizomes short-creeping; rhizome scales ferrugineous, lustrous, 0.5–2 mm long, densely setose on margin and surfaces; fronds determinate, mostly 25–75 cm long; stipes dark-castaneous to atropurpureous, lustrous, 10–30 cm long, 0.3–0.8 mm diam., 1⁄3–1⁄2 the frond length, with reddish setae 1.5–3 mm long, sometimes glabrescent; blades pinnatisect, linear-lanceolate, 32–45 X 2.5–4(–5.5) cm, abruptly narrowed at base, lacking black clavate fungi; segments 24–44 pairs, 14–30 X 7–10 mm at the dilate base, acute at tips; costae and veins hidden or inconspicuous; hydathodes not producing lime-dots; indument of setae 0.8–2 mm long on rachises and sometimes sparsely on costae and veins abaxially, setae solitary (unpaired) on segment margins, indument also of minute hairs 0.1 mm; sori to ca. 12 pairs per segment, receptacles glabrous; sporangia with 1 or 2 setae 0.2–0.3 mm long on capsules; spores tetrahedral-globose; 2n=74 (Jam).A

Forma de crecimiento

Hierba

Forma de vida

Pendent (often with the stipe apex abruptly bent downward) on trunks. EpífitaA

Nutrición

Autotrófica

Ejemplar revisado

Chis (Breedlove 32415, DS, 56491, CAS, ENCB; Dressler 1602, US). Gro (Langlassé 898, MEXU, US; Lorea 2002, IEB, 3030, IEB, UAMIZ). Oax (Mickel 1012, US, 5724, ENCB, UC, US). Ver (Pringle 8158, LL, MO, US; Ventura A. 5119, ARIZ, ENCB, 11610, IEB, MO).A

Distribución

Caribe PresenteA, Centroamérica: Belice PresenteA; Costa Rica PresenteA; El Salvador PresenteA; Guatemala PresenteA; Honduras PresenteA; Nicaragua PresenteA; Panamá PresenteA, México (país) Nativo y no endémicoA, Sudamérica PresenteA

Elevación

900 – 2350 mA

Tipo de vegetación

Selva alta, Bosque de neblina/mesófiloA

Categoría IUCN

No incluidaB

Categoría NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010

No incluidaC

Estatus del taxón

(A) Como definida actualmente, probablemente una entidad natural (monofilética)

Discusión taxonómica

Determinate fronds, solitary (unpaired) setae on segment margins, and long stipes distinguish T. asplenifolia from T. cultrata. Smith (1981) and Mickel and Beitel (1988) cited Michoacán in the range, but we are now unable to confirm this. Specimens cited or determined as this species from Peru (Tryon & Stolze, 1993), Brazil, and Bolivia appear to be mostly, if not entirely, T. chrysleri (Copel.) A. R. Sm.
Terpsichore lehmanniana (Hieron.) A. R. Sm., from Guatemala and Belize to Ecuador, is closely related to T. asplenifolia and differs in the dull (vs. lustrous) rhizome scales that are densely setulose on the surfaces and margins, and the setose blades abaxially.A

Bibliografía

A. Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. 2004: The Pteridophytes of Mexico Vol. 88
B. IUCN 2022: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2022-2
C. SEMARNAT 2019: MODIFICACIÓN del Anexo Normativo III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010: 101 pp. – https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5578808&fecha=14/11/2019#gsc.tab=0 [accessed 2023-05-04 06:16]