Arachniodes denticulata (Sw.) Ching

Primary tabs

Arachniodes denticulata (Sw.) Ching

Descripción

Rhizomes ascending to suberect, short, compact; rhizome scales brown, lustrous, 10–20 X 1–2 mm, linear-lanceolate, entire; fronds clustered, mostly (30–)50–90 cm long; stipes casta neous at base, often stramineous distally, 12–32 cm X (1–)2–4 mm, 1⁄3–1⁄2(–2⁄3) the frond length, glabrous except for linear brown scales at bases; blades dark green adaxially, lighter green abaxially, chartaceous to subcoriaceous, 12–30 X 8–26 cm, deltate to pentagonal, 4-pinnate at bases, the proximal pair of pinnae strongly inequilateral, greatly exaggerated basiscopically, anadromous; rachises glabrous; pinnae alternate; segments oblanceolate to obovate, 5–8 X 3–4 mm, bases cuneate, margins strongly dentate with spinulose tips; indument of costae and costules of sparse, hair-like, fibrillose scales; indusia tan to red-brown, glabrous, persistent, 1–2(–3) mm diam.; 2n=82 (Oax, Chis), 164 (Jam).
A

Forma de crecimiento

Hierba

Forma de vida

TerrestreA

Nutrición

Autotrófica

Ejemplar revisado

Chis (Breedlove 53600, CAS; Calzada et al. 8728, UC, XAL); Gro (Lorea 3290, FCME). Hgo (Gimate L. 797, NY, XAL). Oax (Croat & Hannon 65634, UC; Wendt 5058, NY). Pue (Ventura A. 366, ENCB, 385, ARIZ, ENCB, LL, NY). Ver (Vázquez B. 489, UC, XAL; Ventura A. 12741, MEXU).A

Distribución

Caribe PresenteA, Centroamérica: Belice PresenteA; Costa Rica PresenteA; El Salvador PresenteA; Guatemala PresenteA; Honduras PresenteA; Nicaragua PresenteA; Panamá PresenteA, México (país) Nativo y no endémicoA, Sudamérica PresenteA

Elevación

1000 – 2900 mA

Tipo de vegetación

Bosque de neblina/mesófilo, Bosque de encino, Bosque de pino, Bosque de pino-encinoA

Categoría IUCN

No incluidaB

Categoría NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010

No incluidaC

Estatus del taxón

(A) Como definida actualmente, probablemente una entidad natural (monofilética)

Discusión taxonómica

Christensen (1920) recognized eight named forms and varieties and several unnamed ones of this polymorphic species. These variants differ chiefly in size and dissection of the blades, blade texture, and other rather nebulous characteristics. Chromosome counts indicate that polyploidy is a part of this variability. Christensen’s forms seem to be connected by numerous intermediates, so we choose not to apply infraspecific names to Mexican material.A

Bibliografía

A. Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. 2004: The Pteridophytes of Mexico Vol. 88
B. IUCN 2022: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2022-2
C. SEMARNAT 2019: MODIFICACIÓN del Anexo Normativo III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010: 101 pp. – https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5578808&fecha=14/11/2019#gsc.tab=0 [accessed 2023-05-04 06:16]