Alansmia senilis (Fée) Moguel & M. Kessler

Primary tabs

Alansmia senilis (Fée) Moguel & M. Kessler

Descripción

Rhizomes short-creeping to suberect; rhizome scales castaneous, 0.3–1.5 mm, with numerous, pale marginal setae; fronds indeterminate, 10–25+ cm long; stipes brownish, dull, 0.5–2 cm long, 0.3–0.4 mm diam., with numerous hyaline to pale reddish setae 1–2 mm long; blades 8–45 X 1–1.5 cm, 1-pinnate, gradually reduced proximally, lacking black clavate fungi; pinnae 0.5–1 X 0.2–0.4 cm, adnate 1⁄3–2⁄3 their width, the bases abruptly rounded acroscopically, short-decurrent or not decurrent basiscopically, apices obtuse; costae and veins inconspicuous or hidden; hydathodes not producing lime-dots; indument of hyaline to pale reddish setae 1–2 mm long on rachises, costae, and laminar tissue, also of paired (or in clusters of 3) hairs ca. 1–2 mm, pinna margins with solitary and paired (occasionally in clusters of 3) setae; sori glabrous or setose from the receptacles; sporangia with numerous setae ca. 0.5+ mm long on capsules; spores ellipsoid, monolete.A

Forma de crecimiento

Hierba

Forma de vida

laxamente colgante. EpífitaA

Nutrición

Autotrófica

Ejemplar revisado

(Related to the synonym Terpsichore senilis) Chis (Breedlove 68357, CAS, UC; Münch 119, US).A

Distribución

Centroamérica: Costa Rica PresenteA; Guatemala PresenteA; Honduras PresenteA; Panamá PresenteA, México (país) Nativo y no endémicoA, Sudamérica PresenteA

Elevación

2750 mA

Tipo de vegetación

Bosque de neblina/mesófiloA

Categoría IUCN

No incluidaB

Categoría NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010

No incluidaC

Estatus del taxón

(A) Como definida actualmente, probablemente una entidad natural (monofilética)

Discusión taxonómica

(In relation to the synonym Terpsichore senilis) Stolze (1981) and Lellinger (1989) treated this species as a synonym of T. cultrata, but T. senilis differs in a suite of characters that seem at least as significant as those that distinguish T. lanigera (Desv.) A. R. Sm. (recognized by both Tryon & Stolze, 1993, and Lellinger, 1989) from T. cultrata. Tryon and Stolze (1993) did recognize Grammitis subflabelliformis (Rosenst.) C. V. Morton as distinct; we treat this as a synonym of T. senilis. The differences between T. cultrata and T. senilis are especially evident in occasional mixed collections, e.g., Stolze 1513 (UC), Scamman & Holdridge 8097 (US), and Stork 1620 (UC, US), all from Costa Rica. In general, specimens of T. senilis have pinnae less than 1 X 0.4 cm and 1–2 times longer than wide (vs. pinnae 1–2 X 0.3–0.7 cm and 2–4 times longer than wide in T. cultrata), pinnae adnate 1⁄3–2⁄3 their width (vs. adnate more than 2⁄3 their width in T. cultrata), and surfaces of the blades and rachises abaxially and along pinna margins with setae generally solitary, almost never paired (vs. a mixture of solitary, paired, and sessilestellate hairs in T. cultrata).A

Bibliografía

A. Mickel, J. T. & Smith, A. R. 2004: The Pteridophytes of Mexico Vol. 88
B. IUCN 2022: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2022-2 (as Terpsichore senilis (Fée) A.R.Sm.)
C. SEMARNAT 2019: MODIFICACIÓN del Anexo Normativo III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010: 101 pp. – https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5578808&fecha=14/11/2019#gsc.tab=0 [accessed 2023-05-04 06:16] (as Terpsichore senilis (Fée) A.R.Sm.)